This gem provides a thread-safe container for defining dependencies for reuse within your application. Coupled with the Infusible gem, this powerful combination makes Dependency Injection Containers simple to implement, test, and maintain.
Features
-
Provides a thread-safe dependency injection container.
-
Encourages composition over inheritance.
-
Includes test suite support so you can swap in Test Doubles if desired.
-
Compatible with Infusible.
Requirements
-
Ruby.
-
A strong understanding of Dependency Injection Containers.
Setup
To install with security, run:
# 💡 Skip this line if you already have the public certificate installed.
gem cert --add <(curl --compressed --location https://alchemists.io/gems.pem)
gem install containable --trust-policy HighSecurity
To install without security, run:
gem install containable
You can also add the gem directly to your project:
bundle add containable
Once the gem is installed, you only need to require it:
require "containable"
Usage
You can immediately use this gem by creating a container, extending the container with functionality from this gem, and register any/all dependencies as desired. Example:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register :literal, 1
register(:echo) { |text| text }
end
puts Container[:literal] # 1
puts Container[:echo].call "test" # "test"
The rest of this section will expand upon what is shown above.
Modules
Containers must be modules. For example, attempting to turn a class into a container is not allowed:
require "containable"
class Container
extend Containable
end
# Only a module can be a container. (TypeError)
This is important since containers are only meant to hold your dependencies and nothing else. Modules are perfect for this.
Registration
As shown above, the best way to register dependencies is as you define your container. The most basic is via a key/value pair:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register :demo, 1
end
With the above, 1
(literal) will be associated with the :demo
key. This is perfect for registering literals, constants, or any objects you immediately want evaluated or have a reference to. To lazily register a dependency, use a block with parameters:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register(:demo) { Object.new }
end
In this case the :demo
key is associated with an instance of an object but the instance will only be realized when first resolved. Until the :demo
key is resolved, the object is not instantiated and remains a closure (more on resolving dependencies shortly). You can also register procs, lambdas, and functions in the same manner:
require "containable"
function = proc { 3 }
module Container
extend Containable
register :one, proc { 1 }
register :two, -> { 2 }
register(:three, &function)
end
As you can see, registration is quite flexible. That said, you only register either a value or closure but not both. For example, if you register both a value and a closure you’ll get a warning (as printed as standard error output):
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register(:demo, "bogus") { 1 }
end
# Registration of value is ignored since block takes precedence.
While providing the value isn’t harmful, it is unnecessary and wasteful. Instead, supply a value or a closure but not both.
You can also register dependencies after the fact since the container is open, by default. Example:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register :one, 1
end
Container.register :two, 2
Container[:three] = 3
With the above, a combination of .register
and .[]=
(setter) messages are used. While the latter is handy the former should be preferred for improved readability.
⚠️ Due to registration being flexible to begin with, avoid nesting closures. Example:
# No
register(:sanitizer) { -> content { Sanitize.fragment content, Sanitize::Config::BASIC } }
# Yes
register :sanitizer, -> content { Sanitize.fragment content, Sanitize::Config::BASIC }
While the former will work, there is no benefit to nesting like this. The latter is more performant because you don’t have to unwrap the nested closure to achieve the same functionality since there is nothing to achieve from the lazy resolution of the sanitize functionality.
Resolution
Now that you understand how to register dependencies, we can talk about resolving them. There are two ways to resolve a dependency. Example:
Container[:demo]
Container.resolve(:demo)
Both messages are acceptable but using .[]
(getter) is recommended due to being succinct, requires less typing, and allows the container to feel more like a Hash
. Internally, when resolving a dependency, all keys are stored as strings which means you can use symbols or strings interchangeably except when using namespaces (more on this shortly). Example:
Container[:demo] # "example"
Container["demo"] # "example"
When discussing registration earlier, we saw you can register values and closures. A value can also be a closure but if a block is registered — in addition to the value — the block takes precedence over the value.
What hasn’t been discussed is the kind of closure used when registering a value or block. If a closure takes no parameters, then the closure will be resolved immediately when resolving the key for the first time. Any closure that takes one more more parameters will never be resolved which means you can call the closure directly when needed. To illustrate, consider the following:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register :one, proc { 1 }
register(:two) { |text| text.upcase }
register :three, -> text { text.reverse }
end
Container[:one] # 1
Container[:two] # #<Proc:0x000000012e9f8718 /demo:23>
Container[:three] # #<Proc:0x000000012e9f8628 /demo:24 (lambda)>
With the above, you can see :one
was immediately resolved to the value of 1
even though it was wrapped in a closure to begin with. This happened because the closure had no parameters so was safe to resolve. Again, this allows you to lazily resolve a dependency until you need it.
For keys :two
and :three
, we have a closure that has at least one parameter so remains a closure so you can supply the arguments you need later. Here’s a closer look of using the :two
and :three
dependencies:
Container[:two].call "demo" # "DEMO"
Container[:three].call "demo" # "omed"
In all of these situations, we have closures supplied as values or blocks but only closures with out parameters are resolved (i.e. unwrapped).
Namespaces
As hinted at earlier, you can namespace your dependencies for improved organization. Example:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
namespace :one do
register :blue, "blue"
end
namespace :two do
register :green, "green"
end
namespace "three" do
register :grey, "grey"
register :silver, "silver"
end
end
There is no limit on the number of namespaces used or how deep they are nested. That said, this functionality should not be abused by sticking to either one or two levels of hierarchy. Anything more than that and you should reflect if your implementation is overly complex in order to refactor accordingly.
As with registration, you can use symbols, strings, or both for your namespaces since they are stored internally as strings. Namespaces are delimited by periods (.
) so you must use a string for your key to resolve them. Example:
Container["one.blue"] # "blue"
Container["two.green"] # "green"
Container["three.silver"] # "silver"
Enumeration
Limited enumeration of your container is possible. Given the following:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register :one, 1
register :two, 2
end
…this means you can use all of the following messages:
Container.each { |key, value| puts "#{key}=#{value}" }
# one=1
# two=2
Container.each_key { |key| puts "Key: #{key}" }
# Key: one
# Key: two
Container.key? :one # false
Container.key? "one" # true
Container.keys # ["one", "two"]
Freezing
You can freeze your container and immediately check if it is frozen. Example:
require "containable"
module Container
extend Containable
register :demo, "An example."
freeze
end
Container.frozen? # true
You can also freeze your container after the fact by messaging .freeze
directly on the container: Container.freeze
. Once a container if frozen, registration of additional dependencies will result in an error:
Container.register :another, "One more."
# Can't modify frozen container. (FrozenError)
Once frozen, the container can’t be unfrozen unless you duplicate it (see below).
Duplicates
You can duplicate a container via the following (which will unfreeze the container if previously frozen):
container = Container.dup
container.name
# "containable"
Other = Container.dup
Other.name
# "Other"
As you can see a container, once duplicated, can be assigned to a local variable or a new constant. When assigning to a variable, the container will use a temporary name of containable
for identification.
Clones
Cloning a container is identical to duplicating a container except if the container is frozen then the clone will be frozen too. Example:
Container.freeze
Container.clone.frozen? # true
Customization
You can customize how the container registers and resolves dependencies by creating your own register and resolver objects. For example, here’s how to use a custom register that doesn’t care if you override an existing key.
require "containable"
class CustomRegister < Containable::Register
def call(key, value = nil, &block) = dependencies[namespacify(key)] = block || value
end
module Container
extend Containable[register: CustomRegister]
register :one, 1
register :one, "override"
end
Container[:one] # "override"
…and here’s an example with a custom resolver that only allows specific keys to be resolved:
require "containable"
class CustomResolver < Containable::Resolver
def initialize *, allowed_keys: %i[one three]
super(*)
@allowed_keys = allowed_keys
end
def call key
fail KeyError, "Only use these keys: #{allowed_keys.inspect}" unless allowed_keys.include? key
super
end
private
attr_reader :allowed_keys
end
module Container
extend Containable[resolver: CustomResolver]
register :one, 1
register :two, 2
register :three, 3
end
Container[:one] # 1
Container[:two] # Only use these keys: [:one, :three] (KeyError)
Container[:three] # 3
In both cases, you only need to inject your custom register or resolver when extending your container with Containable
. Both of these classes should inherit from either Containable::Register
or Containable::Resolver
to customize behavior as you like. Definitely check out the source code of both these classes to learn more and customize as desired.
Infusible
Tests
As you architect your implementation, you’ll want to swap out your original dependencies with Test Doubles to simplify testing especially for situations, like making HTTP requests, with a fake. For demonstration purposes, I’ll assume you are using RSpec but you can adapt for whatever testing framework you are using.
Consider the following:
module Container
extend Containable
register :kernel, Kernel
end
class Demo
def initialize container: Container
@container = container
end
def speak(text) = kernel.puts text
private
attr_reader :container
def kernel = container[__method__]
end
With our implementation defined, we can test as follows:
RSpec.describe Demo do
subject(:demo) { Demo.new }
let(:kernel) { class_spy Kernel }
before { Container.stub! kernel: }
after { Container.restore }
describe "#call" do
it "prints message" do
demo.speak "Hello"
expect(kernel).to have_received(:puts).with("Hello")
end
end
end
Notice there is little setup required to test the injected dependencies. Simply define what you want stubbed in your before
and after
blocks. That’s it!
While the above works great for a single spec, over time you’ll want to reduce duplicated setup by using a shared context. Here’s a rewrite of the above spec which significantly reduces duplication when needing to test multiple objects using the same dependencies:
# spec/support/shared_contexts/application_container.rb
RSpec.shared_context "with application dependencies" do
let(:kernel) { class_spy Kernel }
before { Container.stub! kernel: }
after { Container.restore }
end
# spec/lib/demo_spec.rb
RSpec.describe Demo do
subject(:demo) { Demo.new }
include_context "with application dependencies"
describe "#call" do
it "prints message" do
demo.speak "Hello"
expect(kernel).to have_received(:puts).with("Hello")
end
end
end
You’ll notice, in all of the examples, only two methods are used: .stub!
and .restore
. The first allows you supply keyword arguments of all dependencies you want stubbed. The last ensures your test suite is properly cleaned up so all stubs are removed and the container is restored to it’s original state. If you don’t restore your container after each spec, you’ll end up with stubs leaking across your specs and RSpec will error to the same effect as well.
Always use .stub!
to set your container up for testing. Once setup, you can add more stubs by using the .stub
method (without the bang). So, to recap, use .stub!
as a one-liner for setup and initial stubs then use .stub
to add more stubs after the fact. Finally, ensure you restore (i.e. .restore
) your container for proper cleanup after each test.
‼️ Use of .stub!
, while convenient for testing, should — under no circumstances — be used in production code because it is meant for testing purposes only.
Development
To contribute, run:
git clone https://github.com/bkuhlmann/containable
cd containable
bin/setup
You can also use the IRB console for direct access to all objects:
bin/console
Tests
To test, run:
bin/rake
Credits
-
Built with Gemsmith.
-
Engineered by Brooke Kuhlmann.